"So what did he actually accuse you of then?"

A complete list of every failed, crackpot allegation Paisley has made against me over the last two years.

People keep asking me what exactly Paisley was accusing me of. The answer is “quite a lot of things.” Some things are genuinely hilarious (read on for details how “happy Christmas” can count as libel). Some are scary, carrying long prison sentences. This is the complete list of everything I’ve been accused of by Paisley, via various channels - first Twitter, then threatening legal letters, then accusations to the police, then more legal letters, then a High Court Writ and pleadings.

All these allegations have all been dropped - they were all; without basis in reality (for example, I did not accuse Paisley of being a child molester); without basis in law (there is no way to breach somebody’s right to life using only your twitter account); or regarding things I am entitled in the law to say and do (truth is a complete defence against libel).

The astute reader may recognise by the sheer range and number of allegations that Paisley was not citing specific instances of behaviour by which he felt aggrieved - but was instead, employing a scattergun method, attempting to win a war of attrition, slinging legal mud, through various channels, in the hope that something, anything, would stick.

I intend to publish my (completely successful) defences to these allegations over the next few days for the simple reason that I think they will be useful to those wanting to demonstrate queer theory is a predator’s charter, and utterly incompatible with child safeguarding.

So here’s the list - if you’re interested.

Paisley has accused me of:

Being the leader of a British hate group (later changed to an Irish hate group).

Libel

Malicious Communications

Misuse of an electronic communications network

Transphobic hate crime

Homophobic hate crime.

Harassment.

Speaking about “various people” in a seriously defamatory manner.

“Publicly and explicitly naming” him

Vague and unspecified “unlawful behaviour” with regard to the above two points so bad that Paisley was “required” to report me to the PPSNI.

Threatening Paisley with legal proceedings for harassment.

Publishing that I had been reported to the police by Paisley (as I am entitled to do).

Publicly publishing “extreme and sensitive” information about Paisley, namely that he was is the victim of childhood sexual abuse (information he, himself, put in the public domain).

Publishing “unlawful content” online.

Accusing Paisley of being a paedophile

Accusing Paisley of sexually abusing children.

Accusing Paisley of being a sexual predator.

Accusing Paisley of advocating for child sex abuse.

Accusing Paisley of being a highly dangerous criminal.

Accusing Paisley of harassing me

Accusing Paisley of harassing other people

Accusing Paisley of abusing the PSNI

Accusing Paisley of being a bully.

Accusing Paisley of being abusive.

Accusing Paisley of acting “unlawfully.”

“Enticing” my audience to mock and bully Paisley, pursuant to the Malicious Communications Act. (“Incitement” is the correct legal term - I am the only person in the history of the world so alluring that instead of inciting people to hatred, I will entice them).

Contravening Paisley’s EU Right to life (Article 2) using only my twitter account.

Contravening Paisley’s EU Right to freedom from torture and inhuman [sic] or degrading treatment (Article 3) using only my twitter account.

Contravening Paisley’s EU right to a family life (Article 8) using only my twitter account.

Defaming Paisley by stating facts about his actions.

Defaming Paisley by reading out his own tweets.

Defaming Paisley by wishing him a happy Christmas, a soft pillow and a life full of love, as I wish for everybody.

Explicitly and publicly threatening Paisley.

Causing and encouraging various individuals to make explicit and violent threats to Paisley’s life.

Breach of privacy with regards to stating publicly that Paisley had reported me to the PSNI.

Misuse of private information stating publicly that Paisley had reported me to the PSNI.

Breach of data protection rights stating publicly that Paisley had reported me to the PSNI.

Causing significant “distress and anxiety” by reporting publicly that Paisley had reported me to the police.

Breach of privacy with regards to disclosing publicly that Paisley was a victim of “childhood sexual assault.”

Misuse of private information with regards to disclosing publicly that Paisley was a victim of “childhood sexual assault.”

Breach of data protection rights with regards to disclosing publicly that Paisley was a victim of “childhood sexual assault.”

Causing significant “distress and harm” by reporting publicly that Paisley was a victim of “childhood sexual assault.

Subjecting Paisley to a “continuous campaign of harassment” dating from December 2020.

Attempting to “incite hatred and cause distress” to Paisley with tweets made in December 2020.

Sending “threatening correspondence.”

Libel

Slander

Under article 82 of the General Data Protection Regulation and section 168 of the Data Protection act, for breach of data protection duties under the GDPR (including articles 5(1)(a), (C) and (d)

Making a number of libellous tweets and speeches

That I have accused Paisley of being a paedophile

That I have accused Paisley of being a paedophile enabler.

That I have accused Paisley of being engaged in the grooming of children.

That I have accused Paisley of being engaged in the abuse of children.

That I have accused Paisley of trying to normalise sex offenders showing their genitals to women and girls they do not know.

That I have accused Paisley of seeking to justify men who engage in gross indecency by exposing their genitals to women and girls they do not know. 

That I have accused Paisley of standing up for paedophiles, sexual predators, flashers and perverts.

That I have alleged that Paisley is a bully

That I have accused Paisley of being dangerous

That I have accused Paisley of being a narcissist.

That I have accused Paisley of being a misogynist

That I have accused Paisley of vexatiously trolling people online.

That I have accused Paisley of attempting to dox me.

That I have accuse Paisley of wrongfully presenting himself as a victim.

That I have accused Paisley of wrongfully reporting things to the police for his own ends.

That I have accused Paisley of reporting me to the police for “nothing more than tweeting against child rapists and their enabliers.”

That I have accused Paisley of sending baseless legal letters to women in an attempt to scare them.

That I have accused Paisley of attempting to intimidate women with whom he disagrees.

That I have accused Paisley of wrongfully presenting himself as a victim.

That I have accused Paisley of terrorising women across the United Kingdom.